Efficiency Evaluation of Autonomic Heart Control by Using the Principal Component Analysis of ECG P-Wave

Summary

Background: Cardiac output is controlled by the autonomic nervous system by changing the heart rate and/or the contractions of the heart muscle in response to the hemodynamic needs of the whole body. Malfunction of these mechanisms causes the postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome and/or the chronic fatigue syndrome. Evaluation of functionality and efficiency of the control mechanisms could give valuable diagnostic information in the early stages of dysfunction of the heart control systems and help to monitor the healing process in rehabilitation period after interventions.

Objectives: In this study we demonstrate how P-wave changes evoked by an ortho-static test could be quantitatively evaluated by using the method based on the principal component analysis.

Methods: ECG signals were recorded during an orthostatic test performed according to the typical protocol in three groups of volunteer subjects representing healthy young and older persons, part of which had transient periods of supraventricular arrhythmias. Quantitative evaluation of P-wave morphology changes was performed by means of principal component analysis-based method.

Results: Principal component-based estimates showed certain variety of P-wave shape during orthostatic test, what revealed a possibility to evaluate the properties of para-sympathetic heart control.

Conclusions: Quantitative evaluation of ECG P-wave changes evoked by an orthostatic test by using a newly developed method provides a quantitative estimate for functionality and efficiency of the heart rate control mechanisms. The method could be used in eHealth systems.

Keywords

Principal component analysis - autonomic heart control - ECG P-wave

• References

• 1 Hainsworth R. The control and physiological importance of heart rate. In: Malik M, Camm AJ. (eds). Heart Rate Variability. New York: Futura; 1995. pp 3-19.
• 2 Stewart JM. Autonomic nervous system dysfunction in adolescents with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome and chronic fatigue syndrome is characterized by attenuated vagal baroreflex and potentiated sympathetic vasomotion. Pediatr Res 2000; 48 (02) 218-226.
• 3 Ziegler D, Dannehl D, Muhlen H, Spuler M, Gries FA. Prevalence of cardiovascular autonomic dys-function assessed by spectral analysis, vector analysis, and standard tests of heart rate variation and blood pressure responses at various stages of diabetic neuropathy. Diabet Med 1992; 9: 806-814.
• 4 Jacob G, Costa F, Biaggioni I. Spectrum of autonomic cardiovascular neuropathy in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2003; 26 (7): 2174-2180. Erratum in: Diabetes Care 2003; 26 (09) 2708.
• 5 Ito M, Pride HP, Zipes DP. Defibrillating shocks delivered to the heart impair efferent sympathetic responsiveness. Circulation 1993; 88 (06) 2661-2673.
• 6 Rigden LB, Mitrani RD, Wellman HN, Klein LS, Miles WM, Zipes DP. Defibrillation shocks over epicardial patches produce sympathetic neural dys-function in man. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1996; 7 (05) 398-405.
• 7 Pauza DH, Skripka V, Pauziene N, Stropus R. Morphology, distribution, and variability of the epicardiac neural ganglionated subplexuses in the human heart. Anat Rec 2000; 259 (04) 353-382.
• 8 Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology.. Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Eur Heart J 1996; 17: 354-381.
• 9 Krisciukaitis A, Bukauskas F, Adomonis V, Lukosevicius K, Muckus K. Changes of Orthogonal Leads during Pacemaker Migration. Electrophysiology and Surgery of Cardiac Arhythmias. Vilnius: “Mokslas”; 1987 pp 41-46.
• 10 Boyett MR, Honjo H, Kodama I. The sinoatrial node, a heterogeneous pacemaker structure. Cardiovasc Res 2000; 47 (04) 658-687 (Review).
• 11 Kodama I, Boyett MR, Suzuki R, Honjo H, Toyama J. Regional differences in the response of the isolated sino-atrial node of the rabbit to vagal stimulation. J Physiol 1996; 495 Pt 3 785-801.
• 12 Adomonis VM, Bredikis IuIu, Bukauskas FF, Lukoshiavichius KK, Mutskus KS. Transposition of the pacemaker in the right atrium during stimulation of the vagus nerve in the dog. Biull Eksp Biol Med 1987; 103 (04) 387-390. (In Russian.).
• 13 Shibata N, Inada S, Mitsui K, Honjo H, Yamamoto M, Niwa R, Boyett MR, Kodama I. Pacemaker shift in the rabbit sinoatrial node in response to vagal nerve stimulation. Exp Physiol 2001; 86 (02) 177-184.
• 14 Bouman LN, Gerlings ED, Biersteker PA, Bonke FI. Pacemaker shift in the sino-atrial node during vagal stimulation. Pflugers Arch 1968; 302 (03) 255-267.
• 15 Levy MN, Martin PJ, Tesse SL. Neural regulation of the heart beat. Annual Reviews in Physiology 1981; 43: 443-453.
• 16 Krisciukaitis A, Bukauskas F, Puodzius S. Investigations on hypoxic pacemaker shifts. Abs. 10th International Biophysics Congress, Vancouver, July 29 to August 3 1990, Canada: p 405.
• 17 Pappano AJ. Vagal stimulation of the heartbeat. Muscarinic receptor hypothesis. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 1991; 2: 262-273.
• 18 Jollife IT. Principal component analysis (second edition). New York: Springer; 2002. (ISBN 0-378-95442-2).
• 19 Krisciukaitis A, Simoliuniene R, Tamosiunas M, Saferis V, Vainoras A, Gargasas L. Estimation of Autonomic Heart Control by Means of Cluster Analysis of Quantitative Estimates of ECG P-Wave Shape. Proc Int Conf CeHR 2007, AKA Berlin: 2008. pp 179-184.
• 20 Vitartaite A, Vainoras A, Sedekerskiene V, Poderys J. The influence of aerobics exercise to cardiovascular functional parameters of 30-40 year old women. Medicina (Kaunas) 2004; 40 (05) 451-458.
• 21 Sörnmo L, Laguna P. Bioelectrical Signal Processing in Cardiac and Neurological Applications. Academic Press; (June 15, 2005). ISBN: 0124375529.
• 22 Besse P, Ferre L. Sur l’usage de la validation croisée en analyse en composantes principales. Rev Stat Appl 1993; 41: 71-76.
• 23 Wold S. Cross-validatory estimation of the number of components in factor and pricipal component models. Technometrics 1978; 20: 397-405.
• 24 Krisciukaitis A, Tamosiunas M, Jakuska P, Veteikis R, Lekas R, Saferis V, Benetis R. Evaluation of ischemic injury of the cardiac tissue by using the principal component analysis of an epicardial electrogram. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2006; 82 (02) 121-129.
• 25 Saferis V, Vilkauskas LA. Cluster Analysis by Testing the Statistical Hypothesis of Uniformity. Statistics in Medicine 1996; 15: 817-821.
• 26 Kuo TB, Lin T, Yang CC, Li CL, Chen CF, Chou P. Effect of aging on gender differences in neural control of heart rate. Am J Physiol 1999; 277 6 Pt 2 H2233-9.
• 27 Olshansky B. Interrelationships between the autonomic nervous system and atrial fibrillation. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2005; 48 (01) 57-78 (Review).